Ontario eyes speeding up wind turbine approvals

January 7, 2009 at 2:16 pm 1 comment

Ontario eyes speeding up wind turbine approvals; Green proposals would limit municipal powers
A draft provincial government proposal to “streamline” the approval of green energy projects such as industrial wind turbines would effectively strip Ontario’s municipal governments of much of their power to decide whether they want such facilities to be established in their communities.

The document, a first draft of a proposed new Green Energy Act for Ontario, is dated Dec. 10, 2008. Its full title is a bit of a mouthful: “A Proposal for An Act Granting Priority to Renewable Energy Sources to Manage Global Climate Change, Protect the Environment and Streamline Project Approvals.”

It’s the “Streamline Project Approvals” part of the title that will be of the most interest to residents of this region, where a series of proposed wind farm projects in the Townships of Madawaska Valley, South Algonquin, Bonnechere Valley and elsewhere are now before municipal councils.

The document surfaces as proposed industrial wind turbine operations are meeting with resistance in several communities across the province. Last fall, the council of the Township of South Algonquin voted to impose a 10-year moratorium on the approval of any wind farm proposals. RES Canada Inc. wants to build between 40 and 60 such turbines in the township on Crown land just outside the south-eastern edge of Algonquin Provincial Park. The plans are strongly opposed by many year-round and seasonal residents. Plans by the SkyPower company for six turbines on the hills north of Wilno are also running into well-organized opposition. Farther afield, the town council of Essex, near Windsor, is considering a ban on such projects until all health questions and other concerns raised by residents are clearly answered by the province.

Ontario Energy Minister George Smitherman, who has a reputation for being both outspoken and confrontational, has made it clear that he is frustrated at public opposition to wind energy projects, which are a big part of his government’s Green Energy Act plans. Last fall, after South Algonquin imposed a moratorium on wind turbines, he sent a letter to Barry’s Bay This Week outlining his “disappointment” at council’s move.

In its preamble, the draft provincial document says “Ontario is a world leader in the effort to arrest global climate change and the protection of greenspace.” The paper then lays out the many benefits to the environment of green energy, and outlines plans to “make Ontario a global leader in the development of renewable energy, clean distributed energy and conservation.”

Scattered throughout the 10-page draft are references to “streamlining” the approval process for green energy projects. But it is near the end of the document, in a section obliquely titled “Protecting the Environment,” where the reader gets some idea of just what streamlining measures are being proposed. The document urges amending the Environmental Assessment Act and the Planning Act by making the following changes:

• Implementing what the document calls a “one project, one process” approach that would do away with requirements that green energy projects obtain approval under the Planning Act. It also favours doing away with any Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearings into new or existing projects if they “have already been approved (or exempted) under the Environmental Assessment Act.” The OMB is widely considered to be the final avenue of appeal for disputes over municipal government actions.

• The government, by way of Orders in Council signed by the Lieutenant Governor, should make regulations that set down “clear, prescriptive provincial standards for the siting of green energy projects (e.g. “no go” areas, setback requirements, etc.) and that determine areas in need of protection.”

The document goes on to say that those restrictions “should be technology specific and based on legitimate and peer-reviewed scientific data.” This would appear to rule out objections based on whether or not a project is appropriate for an area. For example, many opponents of the South Algonquin wind farm proposal object to the plans because the wind turbines would be located near Whitney beside the border with Algonquin Park, the province’s largest provincial park and a national treasure in the eyes of many Canadians.

• The act should“streamline” environmental assessments and use “class environmental assessments” wherever possible. The class assessment sets down the planning process through which the environmental impact and benefits of projects are considered. Such a move would appear to limit the scope of individual assessment of the environmental impact of a particular project at a particular site.

• “Streamline” and co-ordinate the planning and building permit process for green energy projects.

The document goes on to recommend other measures to speed up the Environmental Assessment approval process for green energy projects. It urges “adjusting project categories or thresholds under approved class environmental assessments “so that a greater number of renewable energy projects are fully exempt under the EA Act (but they must still obtain other federal or provincial approvals where applicable).”

It also calls for shorter time frames, giving six months as an example, and clearer deadlines for the completion of the planning/review process under approved class environmental assessments.

The draft document does contain some recommended restrictions on the location of green energy projects. For example, it says that such projects “should not be located in, or cause adverse impacts upon,” critical habitat of endangered or threatened species; provincially significant wetlands, valleys, woodlands or wildlife habitat; sites of cultural heritage or archaeological value; lands designated under legislation to protect the Niagara Escarpment and the Oak Ridges Moraine, and in provincial parks and reserves.

It also recommends amending the Environmental Assessment Act to enhance the requirements for public notice of green energy projects to ensure that all parties have adequate notice and an opportunity to participate in the process.

Wilno resident Carl Bromwich emailed copies of the draft provincial document to the Township of Madawaska Valley council this week. In his letter, Bromwich charged that the Ontario government is moving “to virtually eliminate the Environmental Assessment Process that is presently in place.”

“First Nations Groups will be afforded a front-row seat for any wind proposal, so that it appears the government is sensitive to this group of people,” Bromwich says. “Of course, the Ontario landowner outside this group will not have a seat.”

“I am just mailing this into municipal council to make sure there is a record of ‘what may be’ and offer up a suggestion that, as a municipal resident, I believe we should all stick together here and work together to make sure our local council retains the power to represent us, protect us and speak on our behalf during what may possibly be a tearing down of what few democratic rights we still have in this province.”

Lou Eyamie, president of Save Our Skyline, or SOS, a group opposed to wind turbine construction in the area, warned Madawaska Valley Councillors at Monday’s meeting that the draft proposal would, when implemented, mean that “you are going to lose your say on energy matters.

“I want to make sure that you know that they’re going to go all the way around you,” Eyamie said.

By Douglas Gloin

Barry’s Bay This Week

7 January 2009


Editors Note:  If anyone questions that this “Draft” is just an attempt by the Wind Industry to force our Government to adopt their agenda then you must read the following comment that describe the actions surrounding this draft by David Suzuki  and his meeting with our Minister of Energy George Smitherman.  The moderator explains how involved our Minister is and how he is “looking forward” to adopting an Act such as this to further his agenda.  After reading this there can be no doubt as to the intentions of our Provincial Government to virtually eliminate the “bottlenecks” in the approval process for future Wind Farm Development.


“Thursday, December 4th, 2008
I had the honour of moderating a discussion on Tuesday evening between
Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki and Ontario Energy and
Infrastructure Minister George Smitherman. The event, aimed at
promoting the creation of a Green Energy Act for Ontario, included a
free showing of The Suzuki Diaries (you can watch it in full online).
It’s an entertaining and insightful one-hour documentary that follows
the European travels of Suzuki and his daughter Sarika as they explore
the creative use of renewable-energy technologies in Germany, France,
Spain, and Denmark. In addition to the focus on renewables, there’s a
message in there about the need for parents to give their children
hope that we have the means today of changing the world for the

If you’re interested in learning about the Green Energy Act initiative
in Ontario, click here.  Green Energy Act Draft  The envisioned act would give renewables and 

conservation priority in electricity system planning and grid access,

make advanced renewable energy tariffs the primary mechanism for

developing green energy in the province (as opposed to RFPs), aim to
support such projects with low-interest financing, promote development
of the smart grid, and stimulate community and First Nation projects,
all with a mind to creating green-collar jobs.

Environmental groups are introducing the envisioned act on Friday in
hopes the Ontario government will adopt parts or all of it. So far
Smitherman, who appears to have a genuine interest in raising the bar
on renewables and conservation, has indicated his support for such
legislation and is apparently making steps toward that goal
. It will
be interesting to see how far the government does go, but if this
initiative ever does make its way into legislation it would make
Ontario THE hotspot for renewable energy development in North America.”………..


Entry filed under: Uncategorized.

Bonnechere Valley Township Calls for Moratorium Killaloe Council speaks out on wind issue

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. Rural Grubby  |  January 7, 2009 at 3:56 pm

    A loss of democratic rights is definitely what is happening here. We as concerned citizens are being left out completely of the process as opposed to the present system, which gives us the illusion of being a part of the process (i.e. ability to appeal, have OMB hearings etc) (not one of these by the way have been won by the appelant against wind development) I can’t see how much more streamline the gov’t can make it for renewables such as wind developers, since they can easily get their projects in place in less than 2 years, despite requiring a number of permits, certificates of approvals and licenses. After going through an elevation request which requires one to review a minimum of 600 pages of technical and quasi-scientific data, I was denied within a month for the elevation and appeal. In fact not one elevation request (approx. 19 in total across the province were submitted) has been granted. All the while Ms Garcia-Wright and her boss Gerretsen calmly reiterate to you the same dribble included the companies ESR and tell you they feel they have sufficient information on which to make their decision.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

RSS National Wind Watch

  • Wind worries wage on: New Davison Co. group pitches one-mile turbine setback #SD March 17, 2018
    Lance Koth made it crystal clear that a new grassroots group in Davison County in South Dakota isn’t against the concept of wind energy. They just prefer turbines find the right home. The group is called Citizens for Responsible Development, a small nonprofit organization made up of a core team of approximately 15 to 20 people interested in wind energy syste […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Supervisors in Parishville, Hopkinton contact Public Service Dept. over objections with Avangrid tracking log #NY March 17, 2018
    Town supervisors in Parishville and Hopkinton both questioned Avangrid Renewables most recent Public Involvement Program tracking log update claiming it leaves out meeting dates and misrepresented an incident at a meeting. The purpose of a PIP tracker is for Avangrid Renewables to demonstrate how they are following through with their public engagement commit […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Locals win Supreme Court battle against wind farm #IRL March 17, 2018
    A Supreme Court decision quashing planning permission for a ten-turbine windfarm in the Finuge area has been hailed this week as a ‘David vs Goliath’ moment for a group of locals protesting against the development since it was first mooted over four years ago. However, the protestors believe that the Supreme Court order does not mark the end of the saga. “We […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Opponents say Block Island wind farms are causing problems across prime fishing grounds #MA #RI March 17, 2018
    NEW BEDFORD – The five enormous turbines that have been generating electricity off Block Island over the past year are considered a model for the future of offshore wind. But the nation’s first ocean-based wind farm also has exposed what fishermen say are serious threats to them caused by scattering massive metal shafts and snaking underwater cables across p […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Industry, landowners oppose LePage bill to gut wind power permitting process #ME March 17, 2018
    AUGUSTA – Wind energy companies, construction firms and timberland owners urged lawmakers on Friday to reject a LePage administration proposal that would gut the state’s controversial “expedited permitting” process for wind power projects. A longtime skeptic of the cost-competitiveness of wind power, Gov. Paul LePage imposed a moratorium on new turbine permi […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Opponents file motion to end Dairy Air Wind petition #VT March 17, 2018
    HOLLAND – The town of Holland and other parties say there’s enough uncontested evidence for state regulators to throw out an application for a large wind turbine on Dairy Air Farm. The town, joined by Northeastern Vermont Development Association and residents Hollis and Angela Thresher and Shawn Bickford, filed a motion for summary judgment last week demandi […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Siting of industrial wind turbines poses unacceptable risk to migrating birds #NY March 17, 2018
    I am writing to express the American Bird Conservancy’s concerns about Apex Clean Energy’s plan to build the Lighthouse Wind energy project in Niagara and Orleans counties. The project proposes to place approximately 70, 600-foot tall turbines along the south shore of Lake Ontario, extending 4.5 miles from the shore along a 12-mile stretch. Renewable energy, […]
    National Wind Watch
  • As Hopkinton moves forward wind law, Avangrid meeting log causes controversy March 17, 2018
    The most recent update to the tracker log also prompted a note from Parishville Town Supervisor Rodney Votra, who said that Avangrid did not include several important meetings. “It appears as though Avangrid representatives are less than complete with their submission,” Mr. Votra wrote to the Department of Public Service. “Most importantly, of the missing in […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Silver Creek, Hanover pursuing “Clean Energy Community” options #NY March 17, 2018
    SILVER CREEK – Both the village of Silver Creek and the town of Hanover are currently in talks with a NYSERDA representatives regarding pursuing clean energy grants. NYSERDA (New York State Energy Research and Development Authority) offers local governments opportunities to join its clean energy communities program if those communities embrace specific “high […]
    National Wind Watch
  • Opinion: Wind farm will further ruin water in town, says Hopkinton resident #NY March 17, 2018
    Our water is already polluted in Hopkinton…most have no idea because they do not have the money to test it and find out. We have many contaminants from having dug wells, this is certain. What is even more disturbing is the blatant disregard of the disastrous combination of herbicides, pesticides, & fertilizers applied to fields all around residents homes […]
    National Wind Watch

%d bloggers like this: